Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
Theriogenology, cilt.74, sa.8, ss.1420-1430, 2010 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
The first objective was to compare sperm quality following conventional manual sperm freezing (cryovials held 1, 2, 3, and 4 cm, respectively, above liquid nitrogen (LN2) for 10 min, resulting in cooling velocities of approximately -14.9, -10.1, -6.6, and -5.1 °C/min, respectively), and cooling velocities of -5, -20, -40, and -100 °C/min in a programmed automated freezer, for sperm recovered from CD-1, B6129SF1, and C57BL/6NCrlBR mice. Furthermore, using these strains, as well as 129S/SvPaslco, and DBA/2NCrlBR mice, the second objective was to determine the effects on DNA integrity of sperm exposed to hyposmotic (1 mOsm/L) and hyperosmotic (2400 mOsm/L) solutions, compared to an isosmotic control (300 mOsm/L). For freezing above LN2 or in an automated freezer, 2 cm above LN2 and -100 °C/min, respectively, were optimal (P < 0.05-0.01), with no significant differences between these two approaches for post-thaw progressive motility, DNA integrity, and in vitro rates of fertilization and blastocyst formation. Both manual and automated freezing techniques increased post-thaw sperm DNA fragmentation (P < 0.01); the DNA integrity of post-thaw sperm was significantly affected by cooling velocity and strain background. Relative to isosmotic controls, a hyposmotic solution was more deleterious (P < 0.05-0.01) to sperm DNA integrity than a hyperosmotic solution for CD-1, B6129SF1, C57BL/6, and DBA mice (there were strain-dependent differences). In conclusion, optimization of freezing distance and cooling velocity (manual and automated freezing, respectively) were significant factors for efficient cryopreservation and re-derivation of mice from frozen-thawed sperm. Additionally, osmotically-driven volume changes in mouse sperm increased DNA fragmentation, with susceptibility affected by background strain. © 2010.