Hard tissue preparation prior to dental implant placement: A four-year retrospective study


Creative Commons License

ARPAĞ O. F., Altan A., Damlar İ.

Selcuk Dental Journal, cilt.7, sa.2, ss.240-245, 2020 (Hakemli Dergi) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 7 Sayı: 2
  • Basım Tarihi: 2020
  • Doi Numarası: 10.15311/selcukdentj.440902
  • Dergi Adı: Selcuk Dental Journal
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.240-245
  • Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigateincidence for the requirements of hard tissue preparation prior todental implant placement.Methods: In this retrospective study, the records of 1086 patientswho referred to Mustafa Kemal University, Faculty of Dentistry,Periodontology and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery clinics between2011 and 2015 were investigated. The received frequency ofpatients’ onlay grafting, autogenous block grafting, socketpreservation, guided bone regeneration, external sinus lifting, ridgesplit osteotomy, alveolar distraction osteogenesis, inferior alveolarnerve repositioning were evaluated in any process of the dentalimplant.Results: 3186 dental implants in 1086 patients were included tothe study. Among 295 patients, it was observed that the number ofmen was 144 (48.8%) and number of implants was totally 309(47.2%) implants, while the number of grafted implants in womenof 151 (51.2%) was 346 (52.8%). The numbers of graftingprocedures for augmentation are as follows; 286 (43.7%) onlaygrafting, 23 (3.5%) socket preservation, 9 (1.4%) guided boneregeneration, 271 (41.3%) open sinus lifting, 62 (9.5%) alveolarridge splitting, 2 (0.3%) alveolar nerve repositioning and 2 (0.3%)distraction osteogenesis.Conclusion: In this study, it was observed that the differentaugmentation procedures were applied to place the dental implant