Investigating the effect of STN-DBS stimulation and different frequency settings on the acoustic-articulatory features of vowels


Yilmaz A., Sarac E. T., Aydinli F. E., Yildizgoren M. T., Okuyucu E. E., SERARSLAN Y.

Neurological Sciences, cilt.39, sa.10, ss.1683-1689, 2018 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 39 Sayı: 10
  • Basım Tarihi: 2018
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s10072-018-3479-y
  • Dergi Adı: Neurological Sciences
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1683-1689
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Acoustic-articulatory features, DBS, Deep brain stimulation, Parkinson’s disease, Speech, Subthalamic nucleus
  • Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Introduction: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most frequent progressive neuro-degenerative disorder. In addition to motor symptoms, nonmotor symptoms and voice and speech disorders can also develop in 90% of PD patients. The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of DBS and different DBS frequencies on speech acoustics of vowels in PD patients. Methods: The study included 16 patients who underwent STN-DBS surgery due to PD. The voice recordings for the vowels including [a], [e], [i], and [o] were performed at frequencies including 230, 130, 90, and 60 Hz and off-stimulation. The voice recordings were gathered and evaluated by the Praat software, and the effects on the first (F1), second (F2), and third formant (F3) frequencies were analyzed. Results: A significant difference was found for the F1 value of the vowel [a] at 130 Hz compared to off-stimulation. However, no significant difference was found between the three formant frequencies with regard to the stimulation frequencies and off-stimulation. In addition, though not statistically significant, stimulation at 60 and 230 Hz led to several differences in the formant frequencies of other three vowels. Conclusion: Our results indicated that STN-DBS stimulation at 130 Hz had a significant positive effect on articulation of [a] compared to off-stimulation. Although there is not any statistical significant stimulation at 60 and 230 Hz may also have an effect on the articulation of [e], [i], and [o] but this effect needs to be investigated in future studies with higher numbers of participants.